| What's In It For Small Business? | |
|
Chrétien would not look good in a wet suit. Day doesn’t know
which way the water runs. Clark's latest K-Tel style campaign catalogues Liberal lies. And McDonough does her own mud-slinging, claiming Day’s leadership
style is "absolutely
abhorrent" (”Day's success shows Liberals' failure: NDP” (Globe and Mail Update,
November 15, 2000)). What does any of this have to do with deciding who to vote
for on November 27th? Nothing. Especially if you’re a Canadian entrepreneur. While all the parties have published their policies, and
subjected us to endless rounds of televised and printed bickering, there’s not
much difference between the parties in terms of economic policies, and few of
these policies offer any specific strategies for encouraging Canadian small
business. The Government's
Role in Business As a Canadian businessperson, the first issue you have to
consider is what government’s relationship with business should be. Does
government have any place in the boardrooms of the nation or should we have a
truly free enterprise system? Simply put, the Alliance appears to have the most
“laissez-faire” attitude towards business, while the Liberals are offering the
most support. The federal NDP are continuing to spout their old rhetoric and
prefer to ignore business if possible, and bash it if it gets in the way of any
of the sacred cows, while the Conservatives are borrowing everyone else’s
policies piecemeal. The Canadian Alliance’s Economic Policy
for instance, spells out their position on government’s role; “We will withdraw
government from areas of the economy where the private sector could deliver the
same services more efficiently and will end the unfair practice of providing
subsidies to industries, businesses and special interest groups.”
The Liberals, on the other hand, have become
famous (or should I say infamous?) for their various programs that subsidize
business in various ways. They promise to continue to “work with the private
sector to brand Canada as one of the most innovative economies in the world”
(Liberal Platform, p. 30). Which position do you find more attractive? I admit that I’m ambivalent about the role government plays
in business. Most days, like Ian Scott, (see the sidebar), I want to hold up a
cross and a rope of garlic and yell, “Get away from me, spawn of evil!” But on
other days, I realize that government
has a important role to play, such as codifying business regulations and
protecting the consumer. And on days when I have to deal with government,
government efficiency and access become prime concerns. I am not a fan of government “interference” in business; I
don’t think it’s fair or useful for provincial or federal
governments to invest in particular business enterprises, especially when the
enterprises they seem to prefer to invest in are those that are failing. How
does this create a level playing field or stimulate the economy? Corporate
welfare is neither equitable or desirable. I’m also not a fan of job “creation” programs. These
programs appear to have no lasting positive effects; they don’t create lasting
jobs, and while they do create jobs for a few, the cost is exorbitant. They
also, I think, can be seriously detrimental to small business; how is the
average Jane or Joe running her or his little business supposed to compete with a
government-funded business? Yet I believe that it is possible for governments (both
provincial and federal) to stimulate the economy by creating a climate
favourable to business, without either unfair “handouts” or job creation
programs. Are any of the major parties promising to create such a climate?
Let’s examine some election issues from a small business point of view.
Subscribe to The Small Business: Canada Newsletter
Email
Have a Comment or Question? If you have a question you would like to ask, a topic you would like to see discussed, a favorite resource you want to share, or a comment you want to make, I'd like to hear from you. Email me at sbinfocanada.guide@about.com.

